Tibet has been part of China for most of the last few centuries. The leaders of Tibet formally accepted the relationship. Why is murder and pogroms of the Hans and the Muslim Hui Chinese acceptable to the West as "freedom fighting"? Are riot police not supposed to supress violent riots and pogroms??
And why are the Palestinian terroriststs evil for resisting an artificial state created by european Jewish settlers if the Tibetans are noble for killing Hui and Han Chinese?
The US assisted the breakaway of Texas from Mexico at the behest of the Anglo-Saxon minority there, later chaging it into an Anglo-Saxon territory through settlement. The West has accepted the continuous rape of the Kashmiris and stood by while the Bosnians were decimated, yet rather magically, China is evil for defending a territory that has been associated with the Chinese state for centuries?
China has spent billions on Tibet, with the world's highest railways, schools and modern facilities, and yet it is evil!
The West supported the artificial settlement and carving up of Palestine at the behest of european Jews who were not even semitic and, at best, who's ancestors had been in Palestine 2000 years ago, helped by a little known Jewish terrorist campaign duriong the British mandate.
It seems that only the terrorists you don't like are the "bad" (anti-Western) ones!
It is quite obvious to me that the US and its allies are merely using "human rights" as a pretext to back-stab and sabotage an upcomming political and economic competitor. After all, a more equitable distribution of resources in the world would lead to lower living standards in the West. There is only so much to go around! It would also lead to the loss of its political dominance. The coddled, lazy and luxurious "first world" would cease to exist.
Talk about hypocrisy. And these riots are so nicely timed, right before the olympics. I wonder if foreign elements were involved? I would not be surprised.
And why are the Palestinian terroriststs evil for resisting an artificial state created by european Jewish settlers if the Tibetans are noble for killing Hui and Han Chinese?
The US assisted the breakaway of Texas from Mexico at the behest of the Anglo-Saxon minority there, later chaging it into an Anglo-Saxon territory through settlement. The West has accepted the continuous rape of the Kashmiris and stood by while the Bosnians were decimated, yet rather magically, China is evil for defending a territory that has been associated with the Chinese state for centuries?
China has spent billions on Tibet, with the world's highest railways, schools and modern facilities, and yet it is evil!
The West supported the artificial settlement and carving up of Palestine at the behest of european Jews who were not even semitic and, at best, who's ancestors had been in Palestine 2000 years ago, helped by a little known Jewish terrorist campaign duriong the British mandate.
It seems that only the terrorists you don't like are the "bad" (anti-Western) ones!
It is quite obvious to me that the US and its allies are merely using "human rights" as a pretext to back-stab and sabotage an upcomming political and economic competitor. After all, a more equitable distribution of resources in the world would lead to lower living standards in the West. There is only so much to go around! It would also lead to the loss of its political dominance. The coddled, lazy and luxurious "first world" would cease to exist.
Talk about hypocrisy. And these riots are so nicely timed, right before the olympics. I wonder if foreign elements were involved? I would not be surprised.
I am not saying that China's treatment of Tibet is valid or even that Tibetan independence is illegitimate, but why are the Tibets opressed by pro-Western or Western countries acceptable? Why is it that occupying another nation is only wrong when it's done by a country that is an economic and political competitor to the West?
My pint is that the Western governments' concern over Tibet is insincere and hypocritical. It has more to do with hamstringing a competitor, and little else. The brutal opression of Kashmir is alright, the popular seccession of the Confederacy was unacceptable to the U.S, yet China should yield to seperatism and is particularly evil for defending what it sees as its territorial integrity? Is that fair? Your territorial integrity is sacred, but not China's?
Kosovo could be made independent because it was useful for poking Russia in the eye, but Palestine, Kashmir and Corsica, not to mention Puert0-Rico are "good" occupations. That seems a little too convenient in my opinion.
So hands-off China you germanic nouveau-riche! Back to the moors and bogs with you! China is re-awakening, you recently evolved Norsemen and Saxons. You are not in the same league. Learn some respect!
P.S. I hope Western readers enjoyed that last bit of reverse jingoism. This is what you wold have to put up with if Ann Coulter was Chinese. Consider yourself lucky that the arrogant butts are on your side!
